Why do firms exist, not just single agents? Why do they exhibit a Zipf(ish) distribution? Why isn’t there (yet) a single monopoly owning the entire economy? Why are they structured like they are? How is that, anyway?
Since the only part of the indescribable state I care about is the part that affects my payoffs, we are essentially done: no matter how many v and c’s there could be in the future, as long as I can write a contract specifying how we each get other to truthfully say what those parameters are, this indescribability doesn’t matter.
Whoa. That is a very, very, very clever insight. Frankly, it is convincing enough that the only role left for property rights theories of the firm are some kind of behavioral theory which restricts even contracts of the Maskin-Tirole sense – and since these contracts are quite a bit simpler in some way than the hundreds of pages of legalese which we see in a lot of real-world contracts on important issues, it’s not clear that bounded rationality or similar theories will get us far.
- Adma17: Anat R. Admati (2017) A Skeptical View of Financialized Corporate Governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 131–150. DOI
- YaOn08: T Yanagita, T Onozaki (2008) Dynamics of a market with heterogeneous learning agents. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 3(1), 107–118. DOI
- Axte06: Robert Axtell (2006) Firm Sizes: Facts, Formulae and Fantasies
- Simo55: Herbert A. Simon (1955) On a Class of Skew Distribution Functions. Biometrika, 42(3–4), 425–440. DOI
- GLMW12: John Goddard, Hong Liu, Donal G. McKillop, John O. S. Wilson (2012) On the Size Distribution of Financial Institutions (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1940220). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network
- ClSN09: Aaron Clauset, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi, Mark E J Newman (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51(4), 661. DOI
- Simo60: Herbert A. Simon (1960) Some further notes on a class of skew distribution functions. Information and Control, 3(1), 80–88. DOI
- SiBo58: Herbert A Simon, Charles P Bonini (1958) The Size Distribution of Business Firms. The American Economic Review, 48(4), 607–617.
- SaMS10: Alexander I. Saichev, Yannick Malevergne, Didier Sornette (2010) Theory of Zipf’s law and beyond
- SaMS08: A. Saichev, Y. Malevergne, D. Sornette (2008) Theory of Zipf’s law and of general power law distributions with Gibrat’s law of proportional growth. ArXiv:0808.1828 [Physics, q-Fin].
- BBRH14: J. Borondo, F. Borondo, C. Rodriguez-Sickert, C. A. Hidalgo (2014) To Each According to its Degree: The Meritocracy and Topocracy of Embedded Markets. Scientific Reports, 4. DOI
- Zing17: Luigi Zingales (2017) Towards a Political Theory of the Firm. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 113–130. DOI
- MaSS10: Y. Malevergne, A. Saichev, D. Sornette (2010) Zipf’s law and maximum sustainable growth. ArXiv:1012.0199 [Physics, q-Fin].
- MaSS08: Yannick Malevergne, Alexander I. Saichev, Didier Sornette (2008) Zipf’s law for firms: relevance of birth and death processes (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1083962). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network