A nonparametric method of approximating something from data by assuming that it’s close to the data distribution convolved with some kernel.

This is especially popular the target is a probability density function; Then you are working with a kernel density estimator.

To learn about:

“Effective local sample size”

understand the Frechet derivative + Wiener filtering construction used to derive the optimal kernel shape in BePi11 and OKCC16.

### Bandwidth/kernel selection in density estimation

Bernacchia (BePi11) has a neat hack: “self consistency” for simultaneous kernel and distribution inference, i.e. simultaneous deconvolution and bandwidth selection. The idea is removing bias by using simple spectral methods, thereby estimating a kernel which in a certain sense would generate the data that you just observed. The results look similar to finite-sample corrections for Gaussian scale parameter estimates, but are not quite Gaussian.

Question: could it work with mixture models too?

### Mixture models

Where the number of kernels does *not* grow as fast as the number of data points, this becomes a mixture model; Or, if you’d like, kernel density estimates are a limiting case of mixture model estimates.

They are so clearly similar that I think it best we not make them both feel awkward by dithering about where the free parameters are. Anyway, they are filed separately. BaLi13, ZeMe97 and Geer96 discuss some useful things common to various convex combination estimators.

### Does this work with uncertain point locations?

The fact we can write the kernel density estimate as an integral with a convolution of Dirac deltas immediately suggests that we could write it as a convolution of something else, such as Gaussians. Can we recover well-behaved estimates in that case? This would be a kind of hierarchical model, possibly a typical Bayesian one.

### Does this work with asymmetric kernels?

Almost all the kernel estimates I’ve seen require KDEs to be symmetric, because of Cline’s argument that asymmetric kernels are inadmissible in the class of all (possibly multivariate) densities. Presumably this implies \(\mathcal{C}_1\) distributions, i.e. once-differentiable ones. In particular admissible kernels are those which have “nonnegative Fourier transforms bounded by 1”, which implies symmetry about the axis. If we have an *a priori* constrained class of densities, this might not apply.

### Fast Gauss Transform and Fast multipole methods

How to make these methods computationally feasible at scale. See Fast Gauss Transform and other related fast multipole methods.

## Refs

- OKCC16: (2016) A fast and objective multidimensional kernel density estimation method: fastKDE.
*Computational Statistics & Data Analysis*, 101, 148–160. DOI - BaHu86: (1986) A hierarchical O(N log N) force-calculation algorithm.
*Nature*, 324(6096), 446–449. DOI - Digg85: (1985) A Kernel Method for Smoothing Point Process Data.
*Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics)*, 34(2), 138–147. DOI - PJJK03: (2003) Adaptive variable location kernel density estimators with good performance at boundaries.
*Journal of Nonparametric Statistics*, 15(1), 61–75. DOI - WeWu15: (2015) An Improved Transformation-Based Kernel Estimator of Densities on the Unit Interval.
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*, 110(510), 773–783. DOI - BaHy01: (2001) Bandwidth selection for kernel conditional density estimation.
*Computational Statistics & Data Analysis*, 36(3), 279–298. DOI - WaWa07: (2007) Bandwidth selection for weighted kernel density estimation.
*ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:0709.1616*. - LiCM12: (2012) Blind Image Deblurring by Spectral Properties of Convolution Operators.
*ArXiv:1209.2082 [Cs]*. - MaHa10: (2010) Boundary kernels for adaptive density estimators on regions with irregular boundaries.
*Journal of Multivariate Analysis*, 101(4), 949–963. DOI - ZhKa10: (2010) Boundary performance of the beta kernel estimators.
*Journal of Nonparametric Statistics*, 22(1), 81–104. DOI - HeWZ03: (2003) Consistent estimation of the intensity function of a cyclic Poisson process.
*Journal of Multivariate Analysis*, 84(1), 19–39. DOI - KoMi06: (2006) Density estimation by total variation regularization.
*Advances in Statistical Modeling and Inference*, 613–634. - Elli91: (1991) Density estimation for point processes.
*Stochastic Processes and Their Applications*, 39(2), 345–358. DOI - ZeMe97: (1997) Density Estimation Through Convex Combinations of Densities: Approximation and Estimation Bounds.
*Neural Networks: The Official Journal of the International Neural Network Society*, 10(1), 99–109. DOI - SmLe05: (2005) Efficient Coding of Time-Relative Structure Using Spikes.
*Neural Computation*, 17(1), 19–45. DOI - YaDD04: (2004) Efficient kernel machines using the improved fast Gauss transform. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1561–1568).
- BeDi89: (1989) Estimating Weighted Integrals of the Second-Order Intensity of a Spatial Point Process.
*Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)*, 51(1), 81–92. - Rath96: (1996) Estimation of Poisson intensity using partially observed concomitant variables.
*Biometrics*, 226–242. - YDGD03: (2003) Improved Fast Gauss Transform and Efficient Kernel Density Estimation. In Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision - Volume 2 (pp. 464–). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society DOI
- Cuca08: (2008) Intensity Estimation for Spatial Point Processes Observed with Noise.
*Scandinavian Journal of Statistics*, 35(2), 322–334. DOI - BoGK10: (2010) Kernel density estimation via diffusion.
*The Annals of Statistics*, 38(5), 2916–2957. DOI - DoHa15: (2015) Making a non-parametric density estimator more attractive, and more accurate, by data perturbation.
*Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology)*, 78(2), 445–462. DOI - BaTu06: (2006) Modelling Spatial Point Patterns in R. In Case Studies in Spatial Point Process Modeling (pp. 23–74). Springer New York
- HaPa02: (2002) New Methods for Bias Correction at Endpoints and Boundaries.
*The Annals of Statistics*, 30(5), 1460–1479. DOI - PaKo12: (2012) Nonparametric Construction of Multivariate Kernels.
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*, 107(499), 1085–1095. DOI - Aale78: (1978) Nonparametric Inference for a Family of Counting Processes.
*The Annals of Statistics*, 6(4), 701–726. DOI - MaSc14: (2014) Nonparametric kernel density estimation near the boundary.
*Computational Statistics & Data Analysis*, 72, 57–76. DOI - Lies11: (2011) On Estimation of the Intensity Function of a Point Process.
*Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability*, 14(3), 567–578. DOI - Hall87: (1987) On Kullback-Leibler Loss and Density Estimation.
*The Annals of Statistics*, 15(4), 1491–1519. DOI - Digg79: (1979) On Parameter Estimation and Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Spatial Point Patterns.
*Biometrics*, 35(1), 87–101. DOI - Silv82: (1982) On the Estimation of a Probability Density Function by the Maximum Penalized Likelihood Method.
*The Annals of Statistics*, 10(3), 795–810. DOI - CrMí14: (2014) Particle-kernel estimation of the filter density in state-space models.
*Bernoulli*, 20(4), 1879–1929. DOI - AdSc09: (2009) Point process diagnostics based on weighted second-order statistics and their asymptotic properties.
*Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics*, 61(4), 929–948. DOI - Geen14: (2014) Probit Transformation for Kernel Density Estimation on the Unit Interval.
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*, 109(505), 346–358. DOI - Geer96: (1996) Rates of convergence for the maximum likelihood estimator in mixture models.
*Journal of Nonparametric Statistics*, 6(4), 293–310. DOI - BTMH05: (2005) Residual analysis for spatial point processes (with discussion).
*Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology)*, 67(5), 617–666. DOI - BePi11: (2011) Self-consistent method for density estimation.
*Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology)*, 73(3), 407–422. DOI - DíJM12: (2012) Similarity measures of conditional intensity functions to test separability in multidimensional point processes.
*Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment*, 27(5), 1193–1205. DOI - BaLi13: (2013) Smooth projected density estimation.
*ArXiv:1308.3968 [Stat]*. - Stei05: (2005) Space-time covariance functions.
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*, 100(469), 310–321. DOI - GrSt91: (1991) The Fast Gauss Transform.
*SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing*, 12(1), 79–94. DOI - RaDu05: (2005)
*The improved fast Gauss transform with applications to machine learning* - Gisb03: (2003) Weighted samples, kernel density estimators and convergence.
*Empirical Economics*, 28(2), 335–351. DOI