The Living Thing / Notebooks :

Research discovery

Has someone solved the problem you have not worked out how to ask yet?

Usefulness: 🔧 🔧 🔧
Novelty: 💡
Uncertainty: 🤪 🤪
Incompleteness: 🚧 🚧

Recommender systems for academics are hard and in particular, I suspect they are harder than normal because definitionally the content should be new.

Could a normal recommender system such as canopy be made to work for academics?

unpaywall and oadoi seem to be indices of non-paywalled preprints of paywalled articles. oadoi is a website, unpaywall is a browser extension.

Paper anlysis/annotation

Baldur Bjarnason, Neither Paper Nor Digital Does Active Reading Well:

Catching up on usability research throughout the years makes you want to smash your laptop agains the wall in anger. And trying to fill out forms online makes you scream ‘it doesn’t have to be this way!’ at the top of your lungs.[…] The same applies to reading software. When you read up on research and papers on skills development, memory formation, and active reading, frustration with existing tools inevitably follows.

At least with paper, we can teach people to hack their tools—extend the printed book with post-its, commonplace books, bookmarks, and inline annotation. Doing the same in digital is incredibly hard without programming skills […] or expensive tools, even when the closed silos allow it.[…]

The cognitive effort to actively and intelligently read a text in depth is, if not equal to, then on the same order of magnitude as the effort to write about a complex subject.

But we only have full-featured tools to help us with writing. Ulysses, Tinderbox, Scrivener etc all make managing and writing a complex writing task much easier. Even code-oriented text editing workflows […] with their steeper learning curves are a major improvement over paper-based writing workflows.

We can also use paper-based writing tactics in tandem with the digital ones, to the point of going back and forth between the two. You can’t do the same easily with reading.

Which leads us to the current situation: our ability to handle complex writing tasks is increasing while our default reading toolset is stagnating at best.

He ends up giving an extensive advertisement for liquidtext, an ipad app with actual UI development, which looks nice. If you have an ipad.

Hypothes.is

Select text to annotate. Add tags and post publicly or save privately.

Reply to or share any annotation. Link to notes or whole pages.

Annotate together in groups. Collaborate privately with others.

Search your notes. Explore all public annotations and profiles.

The have documented a recommended workflow.

pdfx (source) claims to:

Fermat’s Librarian is

A Chrome extension that enhances arXiv papers. Get direct links to references, BibTeX extraction and comments on all arXiv papers.