The Living Thing / Notebooks :

Survival analysis and reliability

Hazard rates, proportional hazard regression, life testing, mean time to failure

Usefulness: 🔧
Novelty: 💡
Uncertainty: 🤪 🤪 🤪
Incompleteness: 🚧 🚧 🚧

See also densities and intensities.

Estimating survival rates

Here’s the set-up: looking at a data set of individuals’ lifespans you would like to infer the distributions—Analysing when people die, or things break etc. The statistical problem of estimating how long people’s lives are is complicated somewhat by the particular structure of the data – loosely, “every person dies at most one time”, and there are certain characteristic difficulties that arise, such as right-censorship. (If you are looking at data from an experiment and not all your subjects have died yet, they presumably die later, but you don’t know when.)

Handily, the tools one invents to solve this kind of problem end up being useful to solve other problems, such as point process inference.

So let’s say you have a a random variable \(X\) of positive support according to which the lifetime of your people (components, machines, whatever) are distributed, which possesses a pdf \(f_X(t)\) and cdf \(F_X(T)\).

We define several useful functions:

The survival function (which is also the right tail CDF)
\(S(t):=1-F(t)\)
the hazard function
\(\lambda(t):=f(t)/S(t)\)
the cumulative hazard function
\(\Lambda(t) :=\int_0^t\lambda(s) \textrm{d} s.\)

Why? Because it happens to come out nicely if we do that, and these functions acquire intuitive interpretations once we squint at them a bit. The survival function is the probability of an individual surviving to time \(t\) etc. The hazard function will turn out to be the rate of deaths at time \(t\) given that one has not yet occurred.

Using the chain rule we can find the following useful relation:

\[S(t)=\exp[-\Lambda (t)]={\frac {f(t)}{\lambda (t)}}\]

The hazard function can be pretty much any non-negative function of non-negative support (or more generally, a Schwartz distribution, but let’s ignore that possibility for the moment.)

Life table method

Over intervals of time \([t,u]\) we define the cumulative hazard increment

\[ H(t,u) :=\int_t^u h (s) \textrm{d} s = H(u)-H(t) \]

and the survival increment

\[ \chi(t,u) :=\frac{\chi(u)}{\chi(t)} \]

The following relations are useful

\[ \chi(t)=\exp[-H (t)]={\frac {f(t)}{h (t)}}. \]

and

\[ \chi(t,u)=\frac{\exp[-H (u)]}{\exp[-H (t)]}=\exp[H (t)-H (u)]=\exp[-H (t,u)] \]

and so

\[-\log\chi(t,u)=H (t,u).\]

We estimate hazard via the life table method. Given a time interval \([t_{i}, t_{i+1})\) and survival counts \(N(t_{i})\) and \(N(t_{i+1})\) at, respectively, the beginning and end of that interval, (assuming no immigration) the life table estimate of a survival increment is

\[\hat{\chi}(t_i, t_{i+1}):= \frac{N(t_{i+1})}{N(t_{i})}\]

Plugging this in, we obtain cumulative hazard increment estimates

\[\begin{aligned} \hat{H} (t_i, t_{i+1})&=-\log \hat{\chi}(t_i, t_{i+1})\\ &=\log \frac{ N(t_{i}) }{ N(t_{i+1}) } \end{aligned}\]

From this we construct further point estimates of \(H\) at \(t\in[0, t_1, t_2,\dots]\) as

\[\hat{H} (t)=\sum_{t_i\leq t}\hat{H}(t_{i},t_{i+1})\] By introducing assumptions on the functional form, can estimate the entire hazard function. For example, we can take \(h (t)\) to be piecewise constant, so that

\[\begin{aligned} h (t)=\sum_i\mathbb{I}\{t_{i}<t<t_{i+1}\} h_i \end{aligned}\]

This corresponds to the assumption that \(H\) is piecewise linear and continuous; we are constructing a piecewise linear interpolant. Thus, for \(t\in(t_i,t_{i+1}],\) we such an interpolant \(\hat{H}\) for \(t\in[0,t_M]\) by a first order polynomial spline with knots \(0,t_1,t_2,\dots, t_M\) and values \(\hat{H}(0), \hat{H}(t_1), \hat{H}(t_2) \dots,\hat{H}(t_M).\)

Nelson-Aalen estimates

a.k.a. Empirical Cumulative Hazard Function estimator.

The original Aalen paper on this is notoriously beautiful because of clever construction of a life point process and associated martingale. Clear and worth reading. Spoiler, despite the elegant derivation, the actual estimator is something a high-school student could probably discover by guessing.

TBC.

Other reliability stuff

Reliawiki has handy stuff, e.g. comprehensive docs on the Weibull law. It’s in support of some software package their are trying to sell, I think?

Refs

Aalen, Odd. 1978. “Nonparametric Inference for a Family of Counting Processes.” The Annals of Statistics 6 (4): 701–26. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344247.

Aalen, Odd O., Ørnulf Borgan, and S. Gjessing. 2008. Survival and Event History Analysis: A Process Point of View. Statistics for Biology and Health. New York, NY: Springer.

Andersen, Per Kragh, Ornulf Borgan, Richard D. Gill, and Niels Keiding. 1997. Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes. Corr. 2. print. Springer Series in Statistics. New York, NY: Springer.

Cox, D. R. 1972. “Regression Models and Life-Tables.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 34 (2): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x.

Cox, D. R, and D. O Oakes. 2018. Analysis of Survival Data. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qut/detail.action?docID=5477183.

Cutler, S. J., and F. Ederer. 1958. “Maximum Utilization of the Life Table Method in Analyzing Survival.” Journal of Chronic Diseases 8 (6): 699–712.

Fink, Scott A, and Robert S. Brown. 2006. “Survival Analysis.” Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2 (5): 380–83. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5338193/.

Hjort, Nils Lid. 1992. “On Inference in Parametric Survival Data Models.” International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 60 (3): 355–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403683.

Hjort, Nils Lid, Mike West, and Sue Leurgans. 1992. “Semiparametric Estimation of Parametric Hazard Rates.” In Survival Analysis: State of the Art, edited by John P. Klein and Prem K. Goel, 211–36. Nato Science 211. Springer Netherlands. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-015-7983-4_13.

Hosmer, David W., and Stanley Lemeshow. 1999. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York: Wiley.

Kleinbaum, David G, and Mitchel Klein. 2010. Survival Analysis. Place of publication not identified: Springer.

Laird, Nan, and Donald Olivier. 1981. “Covariance Analysis of Censored Survival Data Using Log-Linear Analysis Techniques.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 76 (374): 231–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1981.10477634.

LU, W., Y. GOLDBERG, and J. P. FINE. 2012. “On the Robustness of the Adaptive Lasso to Model Misspecification.” Biometrika 99 (3): 717–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/ass027.

Nelson, Wayne. 1969. “Hazard Plotting for Incomplete Failure Data.” Journal of Quality Technology 1 (1): 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1969.11980344.

———. 2000. “Theory and Applications of Hazard Plotting for Censored Failure Data.” Technometrics 42 (1): 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2000.10485975.

Peterson, Arthur V. 1977. “Expressing the Kaplan-Meier Estimator as a Function of Empirical Subsurvival Functions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 72 (360): 854–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286474.

Schoenberg, Frederic Paik. 2003. “Multidimensional Residual Analysis of Point Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 98 (464): 789–95. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214503000000710.

Simon, Noah, Jerome Friedman, Trevor Hastie, and Rob Tibshirani. 2011. “Regularization Paths for Cox’s Proportional Hazards Model via Coordinate Descent.” Journal of Statistical Software 39 (5). http://www.jstatsoft.org/v39/i05/paper.

Sy, Judy P., and Jeremy M. G. Taylor. 2000. “Estimation in a Cox Proportional Hazards Cure Model.” Biometrics 56 (1): 227–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00227.x.

Tibshirani, Robert. 1997. “The Lasso Method for Variable Selection in the Cox Model.” Statistics in Medicine 16 (4): 385–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970228)16:4<385::AID-SIM380>3.0.CO;2-3.