Pure network drives just aren’t as awesome as working locally, and synchronising changes globally. Realising this is why the Dropbox founders are now rich. Well done them. Dependence on single remote servers for every trifling step is stupid.
Peer to peer is more robust. (Taking it still further, how about everything be sneakernets?)
Anyway, file synchronising is handy, and tricky to do, so the solutions which do it easiest are also usually suboptimal. e.g. I have been using Dropbox, but their technical and legal shortcomings are awful.
Some alternatives follow.
Syncthing has an elegant decentralised sneakernet design. It is reminiscent of git-annex but doesn’t have a combinatorial explosion of options, just one single sync protocol. It is actually very simple and quite friendly to use.
Granularity is per-folder. Like git-annex, it’s doesn’t support iOS. In contrast, it doesn’t support archiving stuff to USB keys or semi-offline stores. It’s NEARLY user-friendly
Stated design criteria:
- Private. None of your data is ever stored anywhere else than on your computers. There is no central server that might be compromised, legally or illegally.
- Encrypted. All communication is secured using TLS. The encryption used includes perfect forward secrecy to prevent any eavesdropper from ever gaining access to your data.
- Authenticated. Every node is identified by a strong cryptographic certificate. Only nodes you have explicitly allowed can connect to your cluster.
Dat looks interesting. It is very similar to syncthing, with a different emphasis - sharing data to strangers rather than friends, with a special focus on datasets. You could also use it for backups or other sharing. See scientific data sharing.
Mega Easy to run. Public source, but not open source. (Long story.) Host-blind encryption business from New Zealand.
Anyway it’s relatively easy to use because it works in the browser, so it won’t terrify your non-geek friends. Ok, maybe a little. Much cheaper than dropbox. The UI is occasionally freaky but it’s reasonably functional, especially for its bargain-basement price. An OK tradeoff of respectability, privacy and affordability.
Rclone is a command line program to sync files and directories to and from Google Drive, Amazon S3, Memset Memstore, Dropbox etc.
- MD5/SHA1 hashes checked at all times for file integrity
- Timestamps preserved on files
- Partial syncs supported on a whole file basis
- Copy mode to just copy new/changed files
- Sync (one way) mode to make a directory identical
- Check mode to check for file hash equality
- Can sync to and from network, eg two different cloud accounts
- Optional encryption (Crypt)
- Optional FUSE mount (rclone mount)
Dropbox for the skeptical
If you must use Dropbox, you can at least run it in a container, using docker so they can’t spy on your stuff. Probably. At least not on the stuff you haven’t explicitly put in Dropbox, which is presumably already enough stuff to keep them busy so you shouldn’t feel sorry for them. This is not a painful thing to organise, taking about one hour including learning what the hell docker is from scratch. But it is flamboyantly nerdy. and still encourages unsafe Dropbox-trusting amongst your friends. At the end of it, you have made the tool so inconvenient that you may as well have been using Owncloud.
Let’s say you have the default UID, GID and Dropbox location on OSX. Then you do this.
docker pull janeczku/dropbox docker run -d --restart=always --name=dropbox \ -v ~/Dropbox:/dbox/Dropbox \ -e DBOX_UID=501 \ -e DBOX_GID=20 \ --net="host" \ janeczku/dropbox
docker logs dropbox
You might need to reboot intermittently so that Dropbox can run its self-update.
Keybase, not quite a file sync
An in-principle secure alternative is keybase, although it’s not quite syncing, it’s a kind of syncing-rebooted-thing, which facilitates secure-ish peer sharing something something.
Owncloud is dubiously secure; they have security advisories all the time. But even without that silliness, they don’t store files encrypted, so your server host can see what you are doing. Lawks! That’s only one step better than Dropbox!
OTOH, it’s easy to run on your own server, e.g. using docker, so it’s useful for sharing something public such as open research etc for only the cost of hosting, which is low. Additionally, Australian academics get a free 100Gb from AARNET, so we may as well.
However, there are various quirks to survive.
For one, command-line usage is not obvious.
First, you can access it as a WebDAV share, which is unwieldy but probably works. However it’s also probably slow. We really want sync here.
git-annex supports explicit and customisable folder-tree synchronisation, merging, and sneakernets and as such I am well disposed toward it. You can choose to have things in carious version, and to copy files to an from servers or disks as they become available. It doesn’t support iOs. Windows support is experimental. Granularity is per-file. It has weird symlink-based file access protocol which might be inconvenient for some uses. (I’m imagining this is trouble for Microsoft Word or whatever.)
The documentation is very nerdy and not very clear, but I think my needs are nerdy and unclear by modern standards. However, the combinatorial explosion of options and excessive geekiness is a serious problem.
- rsync is what I always end up using.
- aws sync.
SpiderOak was the most popular encrypted service last time I checked. It is based in the USA, which, like Russia and China, is more of a secret service browsing library than a secure document store where you would keep actual private stuff, which creates certain difficulties for their credibility.
sparkleshare is a friendly git front-end for non-specialists:
creates a special folder on your computer. You can add remotely hosted folders (or “projects”) to this folder. These projects will be automatically kept in sync with both the host and all of your peers when someone adds, removes or edits a file.
SparkleShare uses the version control system Git under the hood, so setting up a host yourself is relatively easy.
FWIW this seems to me to be less of a good sync client, and more of a good git GUI.
Academic cred: “Ori is a distributed file system built for offline operation and empowers the user with control over synchronization operations and conflict resolution. We provide history through light weight snapshots and allow users to verify the history has not been tampered with. Through the use of replication instances can be resilient and recover damaged data from other nodes.”
Tresorit is a Swiss Spideroak competitor, which capitalises on stronger Swiss privacy laws, (YMMV) as well as trendy encryption technology. Closed-source though, so there is still a degree of blind faith.
Listing encrypted backups only, because I am not crazy.
Also, I’m only listing open-source options or ones not in a jurisdiction with especially poor privacy, such as China, Russia, the UK or the USA.
Windows, OSX, Linux:
Duplicati works with standard protocols like FTP, SSH, WebDAV as well as popular services like Microsoft OneDrive, Amazon Cloud Drive / S3, Google Drive, box.com, Mega, hubiC and many others.
- Backup files and folders with strong AES-256 encryption. Save space with incremental backups and data deduplication.
- Run backups on any machine through the web-based interface or via command line interface.
- Duplicati has a built-in scheduler and auto-updater.
OSX, linux, more bare-bones:
Duplicity backs directories by producing encrypted tar-format volumes and uploading them to a remote or local file server. Because duplicity uses librsync, the incremental archives are space efficient and only record the parts of files that have changed since the last backup. Because duplicity uses GnuPG to encrypt and/or sign these archives, they will be safe from spying and/or modification by the server.
Linux, OSX, tarsnap comes with a server for $0.25/gb/month:
Tarsnap is a secure, efficient online backup service:
- your data can only be accessed with your personal keys. We can’t access your data even if we wanted to!
- Source code
- the client code is available. You don’t need to trust us; you can check the encryption yourself!
- only the unique data between your current files and encrypted archives is uploaded. This reduces the bandwidth and storage required, saving you money!
Tarsnap runs on UNIX-like operating systems (BSD, Linux, MacOS X, Cygwin, etc)
Others I’ve seen about the place
zbackup, borgbackup, attic, obnam, arq.
You might try mackup to sync settings for linux and osx machines alike to some folder somewhere. It’s a database of which actual settings of various apps are actually syncable. On second thoughts, this is a fragile approach. And it freaks out if you have non-ascii characters in your filenames. Do something different.
git init --bare $HOME/.dotfiles alias dotfiles='git --git-dir=$HOME/.dotfiles/ --work-tree=$HOME' dotfiles config --local status.showUntrackedFiles no echo "alias dotfiles='git --git-dir=$HOME/.dotfiles/ --work-tree=$HOME'" \ >> $HOME/.bashrc
Yes, much less freaky.
Actually, do you know what is even easier? Just make a git repo in your root dir. No more overthinking. Rerevised recommendation:
git init $HOME git config --local status.showUntrackedFiles no
Now! go forth and steal other peoples’ dotfile tricks.