The Living Thing / Notebooks :

Time management

Akrasia, gamification, hyperbolic discounting, quantified self and voluntary blackmail

Usefulness: 🔧
Novelty: 💡
Uncertainty: 🤪 🤪 🤪
Incompleteness: 🚧 🚧 🚧

Opt-in self-behaviour control, by your past self, of your current self who is bored and wants to go on lunch break.

Time management: basic

Erik Bernhardsson, Why software projects take longer than you think has a neat statistical essay with some very basic statistics which nonetheless produce some non-intuitive results for time management. Seque into queueing theory.

Ben Brostoff, Strategies for Long Projects:

Relentless, irrational optimism is the only attitude that works

The original use of yak shaving. Gwern on yak shaving:

Godin’s take-away is that yak shaving is misguided perfectionism: once one realizes one is yak shaving, one should decide ““Don’t go to Home Depot for the hose. The minute you start walking down a path toward a yak shaving party, it’s worth making a compromise. Doing it well now is much better than doing it perfectly later.”"

I interpret yak shaving entirely differently. At least when I feel I am trapped in yak shaving, it more often reflects a failure cascade in the complex system I am currently part of: either mentally I have gotten trapped into a local minima and have failed to reflect periodically on what the best way is, or the system really is broken and once the yak is shaved, requires root cause analysis to find out how to fix the fundamental problems and how to prevent them from recurring.

I see ‘yak-shaving’ as a description of a situation where you are nested so deep in subgoals that you’ve forgotten your original goal, at which point a good heuristic is to wake up and say “this is a lot of yak-shaving!” and think about what is going on that has led to an undesirable situation.

Doing good stuff

Not doing bad stuff

Here, watch Humanetech wring their hands about how the web is parasite upon attention spans. They are part of a recent performative pivot by tech to go from claiming “wheee we know how to addict people to your product :money_mouth_face:” to “oops maybe attempting to addict people to tech is not great please don’t do what we’ve been doing :pleading_face:”. Humanetech have some simple suggestions which have been useful for me personally, but fall short of systemic fixes, like getting society as a whole out of the social media doomsday machine and solving the coordination problems problems entailed by that. FWIW I would happily automate my entire social media identity.

Here are some of my preferred band-aids upon attention leakage. Apps like SelfControl hide the minutely engineered social media addiction machines from your productive hours. There is a listicle here.

RescueTime seems popular, although the fact that it wants to spy on your keyboard input is a little bit creepy and security-risky.

Handy website blockers include stayfocusd (Chrome only), leechblock (Chrome/Firefox). You could use cold turkey for more comprehensive blocking of apps etc.

See also browser hacks for some further tricks.

Theory: time discounting

Start by being aware of your time discounting. (Choose the version of yourself with the most propitious perspective to make decisions on behalf of the slacker pre-coffee version.)

Is this role-playing sufficient to improve your time management? How about quantifying it?

Tim Harford on hyperbolic discounting:

…what to do about the hyperbolic discounting problem? I have two suggestions. The first helps bring a long-term perspective to the daily to-do list. Don’t draw up your list of tasks first thing in the morning – do it the previous evening, when you will have a slightly more distant perspective. When you do so, think about the two or three tasks you would feel most satisfied to have ticked off. Put those at the top of the list and make them your priority.

The second suggestion flips the telescope around and brings today’s perspective to tomorrow’s commitments. When being invited to do things months in advance, the diary usually looks pretty clear and it’s tempting to say “yes”. But whenever a new invitation arrives, ask yourself not, “should I accept the invitation in March?” but, “would I accept the invitation if it was for this week?”

Aside: I should look up why they always call this “hyperbolic discounting”. Sure, maybe it’s not exponential discounting, but has anyone empirically fit a good hyperbolic curve in particular to typical discounting behaviour, or do we use this term solely because it’s the most clever-sounding thing that’s got fewer syllables than “non-exponential”?

And when we say hyperbolic discounting, are we emphasising the far future tail, or the immediate inflation? Surely this is a non-parametric estimation problem?

Dan Ariely shout out 🚧, probably.

Akrasia is the beeminder term:

Akrasia (ancient Greek ἀκρασία, “lacking command over oneself”) is the state of acting against one’s better judgment, not doing what one genuinely wants to do. It encompasses procrastination, lack of self-control, lack of follow-through, and any kind of addictive behavior.

Advanced: autoblackmail-based time-discounting management

Weaponise your social guilt and loss aversion for personal gain! Use other biases against the time management bias.

The next level nerding out is the commitment contract world.

Workflowy should probably be filed differently, but they seem popular in the Akrasia crowd, e.g. integrating with complice

I am ashamed of how well complice + beeminder works for me.


As above, but the rewards and costs are points and levels and badges or something.


Others? I thought there were more, but I ain’t seen any recently.

Anyway, I won’t research that because gamification doesn’t work for me. It makes me not want to do things for fear of getting “badged” by some asinine algorithm.

Mutual time management

Possible exception to the social media timewasting rule: Social networks for mutual social productivity inspection, “Mutual shame, mutually agreed upon”, or the crowdsourced-opt-in-panopticon. Examples:

Complice has an element of this, through social commitment: it encourages you to commit to doing some things, then mark off doing them, publicly. Also it has “rooms” for mutual inspection of concentration.

See also other social-productivity systems such as